Thursday, March 18, 2004

 Martha's appealing, according to CNN Money. In reading the article, they do have a point: I would venture to say a lot of the public thought she was on trial for insider trading, rather than for lying to investigators about what happened. And if the jury was confused about this as well, there's a good argument her lawyers should have been able to flat out say she was never charged with insider trading.

Update: This is just sad.

No comments: